Is there a way to fly flights for other hubs or change hubs? <!--emo&:mellow:-->[img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/mellow.gif[/img]<!--endemo-->

"The FMC does have it's plus's, like it automatically finds the heading and ILS frequency for you, you just have to tell it which runway. Tells you when to step climb, if you have the fuel to reach your destination and works out the VR and vref for you <!--emo&;)-->[img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/w...

"There are certain disadvantages to contining with a failed engine, the aircraft is less efficient, you might not be able to reach your destination, as you would have fueled the aircraft up for a 4 engine flight. And if a 2nd engine fails that would make the fuel situation worse."

"<!--emo&:huh:-->[img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/huh.gif[/img]<!--endemo--> Dude, 2000fpm is like stalling over the runway. That's how they used to land fighters on carriers in ww2. <!--emo&:D-->[img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif[/img]<!--endemo-->"

<!--emo&:huh:-->[img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/huh.gif[/img]<!--endemo--> That's the scarest time to have such a failure.

<!--emo&:unsure:-->[img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/unsure.gif[/img]<!--endemo-->

"Computers are great an all, the 747-400 is certainly easier to manage, at least when doing the flight engineers tasks. On the other hand, the FMC is not such a simple thing to learn, and I'd feel more comfortable with the 747-200's cockpit, which I fully understand and am comfortable, and which doe...