Page 1 of 1

New B748 @ Boeing Field

Posted: Tue Mar 12, 2013 1:11 am
by Jason Thompson
Hi Guys,

While visiting Boeing Field (Paine Field) today I seen N854GT in full Atlas colours looking very nice and even managed to take two photo.

Besides this there was another 748 primer waiting to be painted minus registration and during my tour of Boeing 748 assembly line which was totally orgasmic :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D there was another 748 in primer most likely ready to be rolled out in few days.

This place is amazing :D :D

Regards

Jason

Re: New B748 @ Boeing Field

Posted: Tue Mar 12, 2013 7:50 am
by Brogs
You may be interested in this



Evidently, the guy who wrote the following is retired from Boeing. If true, there is reason for concern.
Thought you might find it interesting...... sorta "insider stuff"......

For one thing the problem may not be with the batteries themselves, but with the control system that keeps the charge on them at a given level. And the 'battery problem" is just one problem in many. Last week I had my regular monthly lunch with 5 fellow Boeing engineers (all but one retired) and we talked at length about what we call the "nightmare liner". We all agreed we will not book a flight on one. The one engineer still working (at age 74!!) says the news from inside is not good, and that there are no quick fixes for the multitude of problems that the 787 has.

The disaster began with the merger with McDonnell-Douglas in the mid-90s. The McD people completely took over the Board and installed their own people. They had no experience with commercial airplanes, having done only "cost-plus" military contracting, and there are worlds of difference between military and commercial airplane design. Alan Mulally, a life-long Boeing guy, was against outsourcing as President of Boeing Commercial Division, but instead of making him CEO after he almost single-handedly saved the company in the early 90s, the Board brought in Harry Stonecipher from McDonnell-Douglas, who was big on outsourcing. Stonecipher was later fired for ethics violations, and then the Board brought in Jim McNerney, a glorified scotch tape salesman from 3M and big proponent of outsourcing, to develop the 787. (Alan Mulally left to become CEO of Ford and completely rejuvenated that company.) McNerney and his bean-counting MBAs thought that instead of developing the 787* in-house* for about $11 billion, they could outsource the design and building of the airplane for about $6 billion. Right now they are at $23 billion and counting, three years behind in deliveries, with a grounded fleet. That's typical for military contracting, so McNerney and the Board probably think they are doing just fine. But it will destroy Boeing's commercial business in the same way McDonnell wrecked Douglas when they took over that company decades ago.

Boeing had a wonderfully experienced team of designers and builders who had successfully created the 707, 727, 737, 747, 757, 767, and 777 in-house, always on-time, and mostly within budget, and with few problems at introduction. That team is gone, either retired or employed elsewhere. (I took early retirement after the McD takeover of Boeing because I knew the new upper management team was clueless.) The 787 was designed in Russia, India, Japan, and Italy. The majority of the airplane is built outside the US in parts and shipped to Seattle and Charleston for assembly. *Gee, what could possibly go wrong? * Answer: just about everything. Because the McD people that now run Boeing don't believe in R&D, the structure of the airplane will be tested *in service*.

Commercial airplanes in their lifetime typically make ten times as many flights and fly ten times as many flight hours as military airplanes, so the argument that composite structure has been "tested" because of the experience of composite military airplanes is just so much BS. So structure is a big issue. The airplane is very overweight.* The all-electric controls have the same lack-of-experience issue that the structure has.*

The only good news for me is that the Boeing pension plan is currently fully funded, although it may not stay that way as the 787 catastrophe develops.

=

Re: New B748 @ Boeing Field

Posted: Tue Mar 12, 2013 11:16 pm
by jacques
Jason, wondered where you were! Only to find out you are only a few hours away! Please post some pics when you are able.
Brogs, that sounds dire. I see the FAA just approved there new testing program today. I must admit I'm edging towards pessimism with regards to the success of this program.
JP

Re: New B748 @ Boeing Field

Posted: Tue Apr 02, 2013 1:10 pm
by Ken S