A plea for some temporary flexibility on bid-flight aircraft selection
Posted: Tue Apr 26, 2016 11:29 am
Not sure if I'm posting this in the right place, but this seems to be the most active forum, and so I hope that it will receive more attention here. I truly love this VA and its structure, but I have one major frustration that is killing the fun of it for me.
The old PMDG 744F, while once the cutting edge, is now antiquated and cumbersome to operate compared to the current generation of serious study-sim add-ons. It lacks numerous features that I have become accustomed to, and which I have come to expect. It also has compatibility issues with the Steam version of FSX, which I primarily use, and also with some of the other functionality add-ons that are currently available. Every time I fly it, I feel like I am losing a great deal of realism, that I would otherwise insist upon. Indeed, I feel like I sometimes feel like I am trying to start up and old car that is falling apart, and consequently my monthly bid-flights are beginning to feel like drudgery instead of fun. After all, isn't this the whole point of what we are doing here?
I know most of us are anxiously awaiting version 2.0 of PMDG's 744/748. I am too, but all indications are that it is still quite a ways off. At the time of this writing, it is not even in beta, and we all know how long PMDG betas can go on for. If this is out of line, I understand, but could the management please consider temporarily relaxing the aircraft type restriction on bid-flights, at least allowing substitution of the PMDG 777-200F? This aircraft is already approved for use on many GCVA charter flights. and can certainly handle any of the routes that the 744 can handle, even if it carries a bit less freight. I also suspect that a large portion of our pilots own the product.
I would be fine going back to the normal requirements once the 744 v2 is released, but I feel like this would be a reasonable compromise to improve the realism/enjoy-ability of our monthly bid operations until that time.
Please discuss and or offer counter suggestions...
The old PMDG 744F, while once the cutting edge, is now antiquated and cumbersome to operate compared to the current generation of serious study-sim add-ons. It lacks numerous features that I have become accustomed to, and which I have come to expect. It also has compatibility issues with the Steam version of FSX, which I primarily use, and also with some of the other functionality add-ons that are currently available. Every time I fly it, I feel like I am losing a great deal of realism, that I would otherwise insist upon. Indeed, I feel like I sometimes feel like I am trying to start up and old car that is falling apart, and consequently my monthly bid-flights are beginning to feel like drudgery instead of fun. After all, isn't this the whole point of what we are doing here?
I know most of us are anxiously awaiting version 2.0 of PMDG's 744/748. I am too, but all indications are that it is still quite a ways off. At the time of this writing, it is not even in beta, and we all know how long PMDG betas can go on for. If this is out of line, I understand, but could the management please consider temporarily relaxing the aircraft type restriction on bid-flights, at least allowing substitution of the PMDG 777-200F? This aircraft is already approved for use on many GCVA charter flights. and can certainly handle any of the routes that the 744 can handle, even if it carries a bit less freight. I also suspect that a large portion of our pilots own the product.
I would be fine going back to the normal requirements once the 744 v2 is released, but I feel like this would be a reasonable compromise to improve the realism/enjoy-ability of our monthly bid operations until that time.
Please discuss and or offer counter suggestions...