Really Flying

Post your Globe Cargo Screen Shots Here . .

Moderators: Staff, HR, Flight Ops

Post Reply
eek
www.meble-kuchenne.warszawa.pl

Really Flying

Post by eek »

I posted this link on Avsim, but I thought I'd post here too, since these are some of the most amazing pics I've ever seen. The clarity is awesome. Looks like they're launching a Canadian sat or something. Not FS, but worth a look.

http://www.texasjim.com/NASApix/NASA%20pix.htm

Extra points if you can name the land in the second pic.
cyoo eddie

Post by cyoo eddie »

awsome pics..... :lol:
Brogs

Post by Brogs »

Wonderful ----------if any of you guys haven,t been, I can recommend a visit to Kennedy Space Centre @ Cape Canaveral, the Shuttle Launch Simulator is worth the Entrance Fee on its own, it will shake the fillings out of your teeth and re-arrange the Vertebrae in your Spine :lol:
User avatar
khelm
Member with over 30 posts
Posts: 391
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2007 8:15 am
Location: Portland, MI

Post by khelm »

WOW :shock: Those are clear! Since NASA chose this company for their cameras, its probably one of these
"In Thrust We Trust"
Kevin Helmboldt
Pilot Number 1684
http://www.facebook.com/kevin.helmboldt
Image
yoni63

Post by yoni63 »

Ahhh phooy, those are screen shots from my FS9 that he stole! :lol:
Brogs

Post by Brogs »

I.d like to know the Cost of one of those Beauty,s, mind you NASA would get it for free, just for the Product Promo, :lol:
John Khan

Post by John Khan »

Mike

Many years ago I had a friend who was Hasselblad crazy, spent most of his money on them.

Tha camera body cost nearly $1000, (I'm talking about the 70s) and the lenses are all Zeis and cost thousands of dollars each, plus all the other gizmos you can purchase.

They didn't have through the lens lightmeters and all sorts of things that other cameras had. I'm sure that has been added now as I havn't had anything to do with them for years.

Very Very expensive, but the best you can get.

John
Brogs

Post by Brogs »

John Khan wrote:Mike

Many years ago I had a friend who was Hasselblad crazy, spent most of his money on them.

Tha camera body cost nearly $1000, (I'm talking about the 70s) and the lenses are all Zeis and cost thousands of dollars each, plus all the other gizmos you can purchase.

They didn't have through the lens lightmeters and all sorts of things that other cameras had. I'm sure that has been added now as I havn't had anything to do with them for years.

Very Very expensive, but the best you can get.

John
Well that will be dependant on my Lottery Ticket coming up so I won,t hold my breath ! :wink: Mindyou my Phone takes better pics than my Dig Camera :lol:
Jamal_Pratt
Member with over 30 posts
Posts: 96
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 9:14 pm
Location: Charlotte

Re: Really Flying

Post by Jamal_Pratt »

amazing pics
Image
User avatar
khelm
Member with over 30 posts
Posts: 391
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2007 8:15 am
Location: Portland, MI

Re:

Post by khelm »

Brogs wrote:I.d like to know the Cost of one of those Beauty,s, mind you NASA would get it for free, just for the Product Promo, :lol:
Mike, I was looking at prices online, and if you want one, you'd better take out a second mortgage on your house. Just the Camera Body alone was 49,000USD. Lenses are right up there with it...

But man it takes AMAZING pictures!!
"In Thrust We Trust"
Kevin Helmboldt
Pilot Number 1684
http://www.facebook.com/kevin.helmboldt
Image
Post Reply